CO129-355 - Governor Sir Lugard - 1909 [1-3] — Page 88

88

as oa onanib-0 edt beba ca eut ave: I

vieve bid antud enoixas? eri 12 abivota of

-braid yna dolftal dom IIły at

notuus? vĹis om vidratos eil

Kinom aðeins 3 Is

«Pranoatru no qira,

ona må mobukao y

I bus sidanlasbe at muso

.wole alde bat o 8700sensbaty vor de

A VITA Not) Juron [srotaže

Bríd JJ #AY-ABS)

rial a nokanibeturi, s. elie Nie mia. tea (amron [fu

1

#saxoy bIxora 34 be.. bike al #1

ni brand et erubunong midi .S noktorg-dua

to sholl sofa to "on možzova no drone

.** Brau¦ [tv!?

10% ami a estri ald .E trose-dur

(a) bts (d) *chuur alse (8

.8 eats

Clause 13.

Clause 14.

ani: art

How Jiseb el (s) - re

SI Manalo at

mit ni andentalġal mont mian qa ataow air?

.2 eara[0

Clause 15.

.Of eeua(0

new anidenī, tatin sult at ator galtaso a envið

woo Lanoletvit e 7 at 6:1ib as 10% oud ade

SonenİBTÒ Juron riangle to DS možtosa shiv)

.(IN ME? gd balse jet ef na C78I

mon Canviųbriť ate kom? el-6. 3 *07 ɛnblvor¶

aa-burl, ow

19 w Is WA 1 - 20 on and of

to 200 HS to VI a. 7 anden di is etib

Bidetua VILLS GIFO. 4 of natts[e* **athroo7% [lvin

03 Jo Lenobe)via oda wont alss s of albustin

od tebar Bles we of (!w as Iazu' to 21:00 sɗT

# mort (3) ecusfo .e.t) molusɛ galbeosonɛ Jxen

sit ni astutidadura & eatzio) enola gnistka egbart

800* tot *Isa A to turo * Met erit sho

.("*~:0

.IamA to do erit to moitolbaltu

SI seusi

87

r. Pollock one of the leaders of the Bar is

desirous that motions for a new trial or to set

aside a verdict or judgment in which there had

been a trial by jury in the Supreme Court,

whether in Original or Summary Jurisdiction,

should be heard by the Court of Appeal and not by

the Divisional Court but I doubt the necessity

or expediency of this and Sir Henry Berkeley

agrees with me.

If however such a proposal is approved it may

be inserted in Committee on the Bill.

Effects necessary amendments in The Supreme

Court (Summary Jurisdiction) Ordinance 1873.

Likewise in the Code of Civil Procedure

Sub-section 4.

Section 294 will it is

submitted be no longer required as an

appeal from a single Judge will lie to

The Court of Appeal.

Effects also necessary amendments in The Supreme

Court Ordinance 1873.

Sub-section 4.

The words "All actions

and other proceedings whatsoever

except appeals shall in the first

instance be heard either before the

Chief Justice or the Fuisne Judge sit-

-ting alone" are substituted for "be

holden by and before a Chief Justice

and a Fuisne Judge

Sub-section 6.

be unnecessary.

This proviso appears to

Clause 16.

It is proposed that the Ordinance shall come

into operation on the 1st. June of this year and

this would allow of the first set of appeals

being heard in July (clause 6).

The

b.